Subject: Re: [boost] Integer sorting
From: degski (degski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-12-29 09:28:35
On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 at 11:16, degski <degski_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> It would be useful to benchmark against ska_sort as well [in addition
> to the Boost implementation], which I would say is the fastest (radix-)sort
> around [and simple to use].
Some write-up on "how it works"
-- *âIf something cannot go on forever, it will stop" - Herbert Stein*
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk