Subject: Re: [boost] question/guidence regarding merge to master
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-01-11 10:32:17
On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 11:26, Andrey Semashev via Boost
> On 1/11/19 5:58 AM, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> > My guideline is:
> > - work that has passed local tests goes into a feature branch
> > - feature branches that have passed CI go into develop
> > - develop that has not broken anything goes into master
> > That is, develop is not a place for experimentation (or, ironically
> > stated, develop is not for development).
> What's the purpose of develop then?
A safety net master is always shippable?
But I've also wondered about it, hence my question in response to Robert's post.
-- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk