Subject: Re: [boost] High number of integer_sequence/index_sequence implementations
From: Stephan T. Lavavej (stl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-01-14 20:05:35
> Bunch of Boost libraries have their own integer_sequence/index_sequence implementation.
> Wouldnât it be better if there was boost::integer_sequence/boost::index_sequence?
And how many of them are powered by __make_integer_seq (when available) for throughput?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk