Subject: Re: [boost] Feedback desired for reflective enum library
From: Nir Friedman (quicknir_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-02-05 19:00:00
Sure, I'm open to such a thing. Although, I feel like there may be caveats
to that (i.e. whether the reflection TS interface is easy to use, whether
it's easy to emulate library-only, how likely it is to continue changing,
etc). Do you have a link to a paper that shows what the latest in the
reflection TS for enums looks like?
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 6:04 PM David Sankel <camior_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2019, 1:20 AM Nir Friedman via Boost <
> boost_at_[hidden] wrote:
>> I have a reflective enum library available here:
> Feedback on the overall design, any issues, any key
>> features it fails to meet, would be very useful.
> An interesting thought would be to provide an interface that mimics the
> reflection TS. That way when reflection arrives code can be converted to
> use it in a straightforward way.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk