Subject: Re: [boost] Review request for variant2, review manager wanted
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-02-24 00:06:22
> If I remember rightly, former senior Boost folk tried to stop
> std::variant shipping with its valueless-by-exception design,
> demonstrating that it could be easily avoided using a fallback to a
> double buffer design.
> Peter and I were both very vocal in committee lists about this, although
> I was not too fond of double-buffering specifically. There were several
> multi-hundred post threads leading up to C++17 about it.
As I mentioned, the outcome could have been worse still. And there are
much worse mistakes-in-hindsight in the standard.
Though, I guess we are actually finally getting C++ 98 exported
templates - albeit somewhat reworked - in C++ 20. I look forward to
seeing if that damning EDG paper on exported template link performance
gets borne out in real world applications by average programmers who
don't fully understand Modules.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk