|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc 19]proposal to project 1 Boost.GIL
From: raghuchandra kanakamedala (raghuchandrakanakamedala_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-04-04 16:23:23
Hi
I have made changes accordingly.Please give me your advises for any further
improvement.
Thanking you
K RaghuChandra
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 3:30 PM Mateusz Loskot via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 10:44, raghuchandra kanakamedala
> <raghuchandrakanakamedala_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > my proposal link:
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-BZO0VuIcebe1ZcdyxHGjOEkQL3eeaXwGtKCWyQQAJ8/edit?usp=sharing
> > .Please suggest me any changes if required.
>
>
> I would suggest to not to give any promises of *effective* effort for
> 8 hours per day for 6 days. GSoC does not ask you to be that specific.
>
> https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/faq
> """
> How much time does GSoC participation take?
> You are expected to spend around 30+ hours a week working on your
> project during the 3 month coding period.
> """
>
> You write "Interest in Project" as what motivates you to participate in
> GIL,
> then you write "Extensions of this project beyond summer of code".
>
> In between, you actually should describe
> - what project you'd like to work on
> - what functionality you would like to add to GIL
> - name algorithms and techniques you would like to implement.
>
> The section later "Implementation Details of Project" feels too much, and
> unnecessary. It seem to mix API description with algorithms description
> and implementation details, with attempt to squeeze all those into
> tiny paragraph.
> Your proposal does not need all those details (for this stage of GSoC).
>
> What is more important, the section "Implementation Details of Project"
> lists a lot of algorithms and processing techniques.
> Are you planning to implement all of them during this GSoC?
>
> I'd suggest to make the proposal more focused, to make it clear what
> you want to work on, what is the project about.
> ...sometimes "less is more"
>
> Take my comments as friendly but subjective piece of advice,
> opinionated though, and not as any authoritative one.
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk