Re: [boost] [review][variant2] visit needs better user documentation

Subject: Re: [boost] [review][variant2] visit needs better user documentation
From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-04-06 17:34:38

On 4/6/19 12:20 PM, Larry Evans via Boost wrote:
[snip]
> However, I did some more exploring, and with the attached:
> 
> when only defined(UNSIGNED_I4), it compiles within a few secs.
> when only defined(UNSIGNED_I5), it times several seconds consuming
> 100% of one of my cpu's, but eventually compiles.
> OTOH, when onely UNSIGNED_I5) is defined, it never terminates:
[snip]
The above should read:

OTOH, when only UNSIGNED_I6 is defined, it never terminates
(waited more than 30secs before killing the process).