Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Variant2 review
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-04-07 16:34:12

Phil Endecott wrote:

> The situation re. expected is unfortunate. I believe really the review
> should have waited for it to be completed. Peter's comment that if it is
> decided that it needs to be reviewed then he would remove it and never
> resubmit it was ... surprisingly undiplomatic?

To be clear, what I meant was that if the acceptance conditions for
`variant` included that `expected` should not be added without a review,
then I would not add it without a review, not that I would never resubmit if
there was interest.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at