Re: [boost] Variant2 review

Subject: Re: [boost] Variant2 review
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-04-07 16:34:12

Phil Endecott wrote:

> The situation re. expected is unfortunate.  I believe really the review 
> should have waited for it to be completed.   Peter's comment that if it is 
> decided that it needs to be reviewed then he would remove it and never 
> resubmit it was ... surprisingly undiplomatic?

To be clear, what I meant was that if the acceptance conditions for 
`variant` included that `expected` should not be added without a review, 
then I would not add it without a review, not that I would never resubmit if 
there was interest.