Subject: Re: [boost] Variant2 review
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-04-07 16:34:12
Phil Endecott wrote:
> The situation re. expected is unfortunate. I believe really the review
> should have waited for it to be completed. Peter's comment that if it is
> decided that it needs to be reviewed then he would remove it and never
> resubmit it was ... surprisingly undiplomatic?
To be clear, what I meant was that if the acceptance conditions for
`variant` included that `expected` should not be added without a review,
then I would not add it without a review, not that I would never resubmit if
there was interest.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk