Subject: Re: [boost] variant - off topic
From: degski (degski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-04-08 08:19:38
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 08:02, degski <degski_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Well, a bit too quick maybe:
Looking at the docs of boost::mp11. In order for the Boost- and the
std-versions to be equivalent (apart from the difference in the
implementation of the variants) , mp11::mp_all (does not short circuit)
needs to be replaced with mp11::mp_and (short circuits).
Needless to say that the Boost version only requires C++11, while the std
version requires C++17.
-- *Microsoft, please kill Paint3D*
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk