Subject: Re: [boost] [variant2] Review of Variant2
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-04-14 16:05:41
Andrey Semashev wrote:
> Beside these mandatory requests, I'd be very interested if Peter presented
> an updated variant proposal, which doesn't create values out of thin air
> except if it's monostate.
Since mostly everyone has objected to it - Bjorn has it as an acceptance
condition - I'll remove the "default construct a suitable alternative"
I'm not yet sure about the monostate special case, as it becomes even more
special now. I tend towards removing that too, and just offering the strong
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk