Re: [boost] [variant2] Review of Variant2

Subject: Re: [boost] [variant2] Review of Variant2
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-04-14 16:05:41

Andrey Semashev wrote:

> Beside these mandatory requests, I'd be very interested if Peter presented 
> an updated variant proposal, which doesn't create values out of thin air 
> except if it's monostate.

Since mostly everyone has objected to it - Bjorn has it as an acceptance 
condition - I'll remove the "default construct a suitable alternative" 
fallback.

I'm not yet sure about the monostate special case, as it becomes even more 
special now. I tend towards removing that too, and just offering the strong 
guarantee.