Subject: Re: [boost] [variant2] Review
From: Jan Herrmann (jherrmann79_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-04-17 14:06:28
Am 17.04.2019 um 15:43 schrieb degski:
> On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 at 13:38, Jan Herrmann via Boost
> <boost_at_[hidden] <mailto:boost_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
> ... unit tests are a good thing do document the internal
> interface. They show
> which assertions the author made.
> Yes, let's replace documentation by unit-tests ... documentation is
> over-rated, no matter what ...
I didn't meant (and wrote) this. My intention is to have additional unit
test. They should be written in C++ which means they can be more formal
than documentation. They can provide an ADDITIONAL perspective.
> /*/*Microsoft, please kill Paint3D*/*//**/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk