Subject: Re: [boost] To modularize, or not to modularize. What is the plan?
From: Stefan Seefeld (stefan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-05-07 04:47:41
On 2019-05-06 9:16 p.m., Robert Ramey via Boost wrote:
> On 5/6/19 4:47 PM, Rene Rivera via Boost wrote:
>> Sounds lovely right? ...I'll leave the discussion of merits to responses
>> herein ;-)
> I envision the construction of a tool which just goes to github and
> downloads a list of boost libraries.Â For each library the download
> process makes a simple transform to a standalone directory for that
> library.Â Similar to what the global distribution currently looks like
> except for one library at at time.
No, no, no. Let's not turn that into yet another tools discussion. This
isn't about tooling, it's about how we want to run the project (or
projects, as it stands) as a community. Before we can write tools, we
need to agree on how we want to work with (i.e., contribute to, build,
maintain) the projects.
-- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk