Re: [boost] To modularize, or not to modularize. What is the plan?

Subject: Re: [boost] To modularize, or not to modularize. What is the plan?
From: Stefan Seefeld (stefan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-05-07 23:56:47

On 2019-05-07 7:46 p.m., Gavin Lambert via Boost wrote:

> On 8/05/2019 01:55, Robert Ramey wrote:
>> I'm not seeing this at all. I don't think any solution which requires 
>> a user to download, build and execute b2 is going to fly.
>
> Unless you want to limit yourself to the subset of Boost which is 
> header-only, or commit to supplying binary packages for every 
> conceivable combination of compiler and platform, then I don't think 
> that there is any alternative.

There clearly is: third parties providing binary packages. That's the 
common practice with Linux distributions, but certainly not limited to 
those. Ask google to list others.

Stefan
-- 
       ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...