Subject: Re: [boost] To modularize, or not to modularize. What is the plan?
From: James E. King III (jking_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-05-08 11:55:19
On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 7:47 PM Gavin Lambert via Boost
> On 8/05/2019 01:55, Robert Ramey wrote:
> > I'm not seeing this at all. I don't think any solution which requires a
> > user to download, build and execute b2 is going to fly.
> Unless you want to limit yourself to the subset of Boost which is
> header-only, or commit to supplying binary packages for every
> conceivable combination of compiler and platform, then I don't think
> that there is any alternative.
This is a strong argument to move as many repositories as possible to
header-only. It would eliminate the mess of needing to deliver all
the variants of binaries on platforms that require it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk