Re: [boost] [variant2] Review Results

Subject: Re: [boost] [variant2] Review Results
From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-05-11 17:01:13

Congratulations Peter, and also Boost. Having Boost.Variant and
Boost.Variant2 demonstrates how the Boost model allows for more
exploration of design spaces than the rigidity imposed by the C++
standardization documents. It is wonderful to see us continue to press
this advantage.

Thanks

On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 8:23 AM Glen Fernandes via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 1:17 AM Michael Caisse wrote:
> > Boost.Variant2 will be ACCEPTED after the following changes are made. An
> > additional review will not be required.
> >
> >   - The library will implement the strong guarantee:
> >     - If all alternatives have nothrow move, single buffer
> >     - else, double buffer
> >   - Improved documentation:
> >     - Addition of a tutorial
> >     - Addition of design motivation
> >   - Peter has indicated that triviality propagation will come in a
> >     future version. The initial Boost release need not support
> >     triviality propagation.
> >   - Expected will not be included but may be submitted for review at
> >     another time.
>
> Congratulations Peter and thank you for bringing Variant2 to Boost.
>
> Many thanks, Michael; hope you're able to start eating lunches again. :)
>
> Glen
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

-- 
Regards,
Vinnie
Follow me on GitHub: https://github.com/vinniefalco