From: BjÃ¸rn Roald (bjorn.roald_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-11-23 12:39:14
> On 23 Nov 2019, at 13:19, Mateusz Loskot via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 at 04:31, Krzysztof Jusiak <krzysztof_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Thank you for your feedback. I appreciate it.
> In my previous post I forgot to add one more point:
> IMO, the library like UT should be implemented as a facade for
> Catch2, Boost.Test or whatever.
> Then, it would offer unique features with real value to users,
> other than the modern macro-less syntax sugar.
I agree in principle that common interfaces would be a huge advantage, however I can not agree that an endeavor to make macro less facilities for C++ whenever we do not need macros anymore, are not worth working on. Whether the time is right, well we will see. But then we find what is missing, and that is something too.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk