From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-12-04 19:00:36
On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 8:01 AM Peter Dimov via Boost
> The documentation is adequate, but I don't find the reference convenient.
I'm ok with it if Krystian wants to deploy the docs using asciidoc,
which is probably a better choice for a single-type library.
> Since the library requires C++11, there's no need to use
> BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT. static_assert is fine.
BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT only requires 1 argument :)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk