Boost logo

Boost :

From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-12-05 17:15:24


On 2019-12-05 20:02, Marshall Clow wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 9:01 AM Andrey Semashev via Boost
> <boost_at_[hidden] <mailto:boost_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>
> On 2019-12-05 19:48, Marshall Clow wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 8:23 AM Andrey Semashev via Boost
> > <boost_at_[hidden] <mailto:boost_at_[hidden]>
> <mailto:boost_at_[hidden] <mailto:boost_at_[hidden]>>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >     Not a suggestion for 1.72, but we could probably simplify
> pre-releases
> >     naming to just RCn without betas. I.e. we'd have 4-5 RCs
> instead of RC
> >     betas and RCs.
> >
> >
> > The reason that we have betas is that some external folks (like
> linux
> > distros) trigger on that.
> > They ignore boost until they see a beta release, then they start
> testing
> > against that; knowing that a release is imminent.
>
> I assume, they trigger on RCs too, right?
>
> Not that I've seen; no.

Hmm, that seems strange.


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk