From: Gavin Lambert (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-12-05 21:52:55
On 6/12/2019 03:11, Vinnie Falco wrote:
> When dealing primarily with text based protocols: HTTP, URL, JSON,
> etc... you usually want to perform string operations. I agree that
> "drop-in replacement for std::string" is not a precise description for
> the purpose of the library, but it is partially correct. If you have
> code that currently uses std::string to perform calculations, and you
> want to impose a limit on the amount of data it can process while
> simultaneously avoiding memory allocations, a fixed_string is going to
> be easier to integrate than vector<char>.
vector and/or static_vector combined with Boost.StringAlgorithm?
Maybe we should just be making a more modern static_vector rather than a
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk