From: Rainer Deyke (rainerd_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-12-17 06:38:32
On 16.12.19 23:19, Zach Laine via Boost wrote:
> - operators < and == can be provided, since the requirements of these
>> functions already suggest a default implementation. The user can still
>> override the provided implementation if a more efficient implementation
>> is possible. If it is for some reason desirable to create a container
>> without operator <, an additional policy argument could be added to
> These are all provided; I think you just missed them.
operator== is listed in Table 1.3, and in the User-Defined column of
Table 1.4. The note in Table 1.8 also says that operator== is required
to be user-defined. So if the library provides it, then the
documentation does not reflect this.
-- Rainer Deyke (rainerd_at_[hidden])
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk