Re: [review] [STLInterfaces] STLInterfaces review starts today

From: Rainer Deyke (rainerd_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-12-17 06:38:32

On 16.12.19 23:19, Zach Laine via Boost wrote:
>     - operators < and == can be provided, since the requirements of these
>> functions already suggest a default implementation.  The user can still
>> override the provided implementation if a more efficient implementation
>> is possible.  If it is for some reason desirable to create a container
>> without operator <, an additional policy argument could be added to
>> container_interface.
>>
> 
> These are all provided; I think you just missed them.

operator== is listed in Table 1.3, and in the User-Defined column of 
Table 1.4.  The note in Table 1.8 also says that operator== is required 
to be user-defined.  So if the library provides it, then the 
documentation does not reflect this.

-- 
Rainer Deyke (rainerd_at_[hidden])