From: Jeff Garland (azswdude_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-04-08 14:11:52
So it looks like a change in math got pushed to develop that fixed this up,
thank you. Are we pushing it to master for 1.73?
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:16 PM degski via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
> clang-10 just got released, so soon, was really soon.
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 13:00, Peter Dimov via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]
> > degski wrote:
> > > On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 12:18, Peter Dimov via Boost
> > > <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > > > Mike wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > As degski mentioned, I doubt clang 3.4 was a particularly popular
> > > > > compiler to begin with, so the answer is probably no.
> > > >
> > > > Clang 3.4 was the default Clang on Ubuntu Trusty.
> > >
> > > And then there was Xenial and there after Bionic, and judging from the
> > > past release dates soon a new LTS release. In the meanwhile IBM
> > > RedHat (and Fedora and CentOS) ...
> > Sure, I'm not saying it's relevant. But if you consider g++ 4.8 popular
> > because it was default on Trusty, you can't consider Clang 3.4
> > because it was, too.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Unsubscribe & other changes:
> > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
> "We value your privacy, click here!" Sod off! - degski
> "Anyone who believes that exponential growth can go on forever in a finite
> world is either a madman or an economist" - Kenneth E. Boulding
> "Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer cell" - Edward
> P. Abbey
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk