From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-05-17 19:40:40
On 16/05/2020 20:46, Andrey Semashev via Boost wrote:
>> Regarding blocking signals, I agree this is not really something
>> that should be part of the interprocess synchronisation primitives,
>> but I do think that a modern wrapper around the ancient C signals
>> API would be good to have.
> I agree, although given that there are many different ways to handle
> signals, I have a hard time imagining what such a wrapper would look like.
The latest revision of the "modern signals" paper can be found at
Last month WG14 and the Austin Working Group reviewed it, and agreed
with something close to it, in principle. Modulo bikeshed renaming,
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk