From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-05-22 14:44:04
Mathias Gaunard wrote:
> Nothing prevents you from using a pool allocator with a deque.
And nothing prevents me from using the proposed ring_queue instead. Do you
have a better point than "you can achieve the same effect in a more
complicated and stupider way"?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk