From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-05-25 13:26:32
Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> If boost-regex is better, should Ubuntu switch to it as the default
> std::regex provider? Such that anything built on or for Ubuntu uses the
> faster implementation?
Probably not, all things considered. libstdc++ has a relatively good
std::regex (by Tim Shen); in Boost.Regex's own benchmarks it's occasionally
slower by a factor of 37:
but typically holds its own.
libc++ seems the worst of the three; in
slower by a factor of 80.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk