From: Krystian Stasiowski (sdkrystian_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-05-30 05:27:27
- What is your evaluation of the design?
It's very clean. While I'm not a big fan of the macros, I do like how it's
reminiscent of vanilla C++ exceptions. Some minor nit-picking here:
following names that are public doesn't look particularly right; makes it
look like you're using you
aren't supposed to :)
- What is your evaluation of the documentation?
The documentation is great -- in terms of styles it's probably the best
I've seen for a C++ library.
The examples are great and they do a good job of communicating how the
library works by providing
realistic scenarios. It's quite well done.
- What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library?
While this is not something I have found a need for, the motivation for
this libraries existence is weill founded and I can see use cases for it.
- Did you try to use the library? With which compiler(s)? Did you have any
I did not.
- How much effort did you put into your evaluation? A glance? A quick
reading? In-depth study?
I spent about an hour going through the documentation.
- Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain?
Not really :)
In terms of acceptance, I'm neutral on that front as this is not something
I am well versed in.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk