Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: degski (degski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-06-01 10:35:28

Next message: degski: "Re: [atomic] Bikeshedding over address-free waiting/notifying operation names"
Previous message: Emil Dotchevski: "Re: [review][LEAF] Review of LEAF starts today : May 22 - May 31"
In reply to: Peter Dimov: "Relevance of platfrom-specific shared_ptr implementations"
Next in thread: Phil Endecott: "Re: Relevance of platfrom-specific shared_ptr implementations"

On Sun, 31 May 2020 at 10:18, Peter Dimov via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> ... and fold as many of them as possible into a few **generic
> implementations** using ... GCC atomic intrinsics ... or GCC/intel sync
> intrinsics ...
>

Isn't this intrinsically flawed (highlight added)?

degski

-- 
@systemdeg
https://www.instapaper.com <http://instapaper.com>
"We value your privacy, click here!" Sod off! - degski

Next message: degski: "Re: [atomic] Bikeshedding over address-free waiting/notifying operation names"
Previous message: Emil Dotchevski: "Re: [review][LEAF] Review of LEAF starts today : May 22 - May 31"
In reply to: Peter Dimov: "Relevance of platfrom-specific shared_ptr implementations"
Next in thread: Phil Endecott: "Re: Relevance of platfrom-specific shared_ptr implementations"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk