Re: [epochs] Internal relevance in post-C++03 Boost of Boost03 components vs. standard equivalents

From: Joaquin M López Muñoz (joaquinlopezmunoz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-06-05 08:25:01

El 04/06/2020 a las 16:53, Jeff Garland via Boost escribió:
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 2:02 PM Joaquin M López Muñoz via Boost
> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> For those of you who are following the discussion on epochs, I've just
>> prepared a report on the relevance of "legacy" components intra-Boost for
>> these Boost libs that require C++11 (or higher) to work:
>>
>> https://github.com/joaquintides/boost_epoch/blob/master/boost_vs_std_internal.MD
> The link is broken -- the .MD is not capitalized.
>
> https://github.com/joaquintides/boost_epoch/blob/master/boost_vs_std_internal.md

Thanks for the heads-up, I changed capitalization and didn't notice that 
broke the link.
Editorial comments aside, your views on the proposal are most welcome.

Joaquín M López Muñoz