From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-06-15 16:09:11
Andrey Semashev wrote:
> > There are no libboost_filesystem.so.1.67 and libboost_filesystem.so.1
> > symlinks in boost 1.67.0.
> Why would they be needed?
They wouldn't be, that's the whole point of the thread, that we're currently
generating them, and we used not to generate them, and that we _probably_
should revert to not generating them.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk