From: degski (degski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-06-15 19:30:59
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 11:35, Andrey Semashev via Boost <
> On 2020-06-15 19:19, Phil Endecott via Boost wrote:
> > 2. Some files have a copyright header which is not the Boost
> > licence. Example:
> > This one has a requirement that binary distribution includes the
> > copyright notice, which is not a requirement of the Boost licence,
> > and will be problematic for some users.
> > Are the only affected files the SIMD implementation, (c) Robert N
> > Steagall? If so, can this be disabled (by default?) by the user
> > to avoid the copyright notice requirement?
> I think the fact that Boost uses the Boost Software License is a
> valuable feature. Having differently licensed files complicates
> inclusion in the downstream projects.
Yes, also for libraries outside of Boost (some obviously by ml'ers), I
always like to see with a Boost License (or MIT).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk