Boost logo

Boost :

From: Phil Endecott (spam_from_boost_dev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-06-18 11:10:23

Alexander Grund wrote:
> I've seen other SIMD UTF-8 conversions around and they
> basically all focus on ASCII converting as much as possible and
> fallback to one-by-one decoding once a non-ascii is found

The question is, do they do that because they've determined that
that gives the best performance (for some benchmark input), or
have they not tried to do more with the SIMD code?

Regards, Phil.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at