From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-06-28 16:21:06
On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 9:16 AM Jeff Garland via Boost
> there's a summary related to LEWGI and SG10 feedback.
I think the entire ISO process is wasteful, inefficient, and loaded
with bureaucracy and politics. Meaningful discussion should take place
in durable, electronic, archived, and eternally available form visible
to the public. Mailing lists sort of work but forums are better (using
whatever software). Face to face discussions where valuable decisions
and knowledge evaporate into the atmosphere, leaving behind only a
stutteringly imperfect and incomplete record by a beleaguered
note-taker do not give the proper respect that the C++ standard and
its attendant community deserve.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk