Re: Looking for a review manager for Real

From: pbristow_at_[hidden]
Date: 2020-09-05 16:38:54

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boost <boost-bounces_at_[hidden]> On Behalf Of Kostas Savvidis via Boost
> Sent: 5 September 2020 17:04
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Cc: Kostas Savvidis <kotika98_at_[hidden]>; Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]>
> Subject: Re: [boost] Looking for a review manager for Real
> 
> > On Sep 5, 2020, at 03:02, Damian Vicino via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >>
> > There is actually not much overlap with other libraries, it may in the
> > implementation details be some overlap with boost::interval
> > arithmetic, but not in the goals or features exposed.
> >
> > The goal in Real is to evaluate expressions that the required
> > precision to evaluate them accurately is unknown in advance and
> > explores how to achieve perfect accuracy for the evaluation, or fails noisily.
<snip>

> so any comparisons should be with Boost.Interval 
> and Arb (which is in C).

And is GPL licenced, not Boost :-(

Paul