From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-09-08 21:11:51
On 2020-09-08 22:31, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> Andrey Semashev wrote:
>> Looking at the code, I wonder why there is "using namespace
>> std::placeholders". Shouldn't there be a separate namespace for
>> placeholders? (I also think, it goes against our header policies.)
> This imports the placeholders into boost::lambda2. There is no scenario
> in which you want to make the operators available without the
> placeholders, so without this directive, you'd always need to use both
> Â Â using namespace boost::lambda2;
> Â Â using namespace std::placeholders;
> This doesn't help anyone.
I see. I was thinking one could use it to compose std::mem_fns or native
C++ lambdas without placeholders, but apparently this is not allowed.
I noticed a few missing operators: unary +, ++, --, <<, >>, <=>, =,
<op>=. Also, unary &, but I'm not sure it's a good idea to add one. I
realize that there are no functional objects for those, but the library
could define them. Do you plan to add them?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk