Re: Review Manager needed for Boost.Lambda2

From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-09-08 21:45:26

On 2020-09-09 00:36, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> Andrey Semashev wrote:
> 
>> I noticed a few missing operators: unary +, ++, --, <<, >>, <=>, =, 
>> <op>=. Also, unary &, but I'm not sure it's a good idea to add one. I 
>> realize that there are no functional objects for those, but the 
>> library could define them. Do you plan to add them?
> 
> I think that << and >> almost certainly belong there, and I was kind of 
> surprised that <functional> doesn't define function objects for them. 
> Next in line would be unary plus.
> 
> I'm less sure about the various op-assignments and ++/--. At the moment 
> I'd be inclined to skip them. And of course op= is impossible to add 
> because it must be a member.
> 
> As for <=>, I admit I haven't considered it at all. I haven't yet 
> updated my thinking to C++20.

I also forgot operator[].