Re: [review][JSON] Some thoughts on recent reviews

From: Janek Kozicki (janek.listy.mailowe_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-09-21 21:01:21

Robert Ramey via Boost said:     (by the date of Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:01:58 -0700)

> > * If this is so important, why does Boost.Serialization not have it?
> 
> Good question.  FYI - no one has EVER requested or even inquired about 
> this.  I don't think it would be very hard (the xml_archive is hard). 
> Maybe everyone who felt the needed it just made there own.  It's also 
> possible that no one uses the serialization library anymore.

I think that it's so good that there is nothing left to ask about
(except for problems with serializing boost::optional ;) #165

Vinnie Falco via Boost said:     (by the date of Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:46:13 -0700)

> Not to put too fine a point on it...but these arguments against Boost.JSON
> do not withstand any sort of scrutiny; rational readers should find them
> entirely unconvincing.

Agreed.

-- 
# Janek Kozicki                              http://janek.kozicki.pl/