From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-09-23 13:54:25
Vinnie Falco wrote:
> I had that originally, it was called number_parser, it was a public
> interface, and it was one of the first things to go during our 3-month
> journey of optimization.
I suspect that something similar would have happened to the hypothetical
pull parser lowest level, if there were one. It seems to me that the pull
parser would be very similar to the current parser, except it would need to
suspend on each token, instead of on each buffer boundary. This probably has
a performance cost.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk