Re: [review][JSON] Review of JSON starts today: Sept 14 - Sept 23

From: Pranam Lashkari (plashkari628_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-09-24 14:51:04

Formal review of JSON has ended officially now. I would take a couple of
days to compile and declare the results.

Thank you very much to everyone who has invested time to review this
library.

On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 9:37 PM Pranam Lashkari <plashkari628_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> Tomorrow(23rd Sept) is going to be the last day to submit an official
> review for the JSON, so if you are willing to submit review, hurry up.
>
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 7:12 PM Pranam Lashkari <plashkari628_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>> Again I request everyone to spare some time to review this library. Last
>> day to submit the official review would be on the 23rd of September. There
>> is no way this review would be extended as there are other reviews aligned
>> so please submit the review as soon as possible. Every review is really
>> important to boost.
>>
>> Thank you very much for your time in advance.
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 1:00 PM Pranam Lashkari <plashkari628_at_[hidden]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Boost formal review of Vinnie Falco and Krystian Stasiowski's library
>>> JSON starts today and will run for 10 days ending on 23 Sept 2020. Both of
>>> these authors have already developed a couple of libraries which are
>>> accepted in Boost(boost beast and Static String)
>>>
>>> This library focuses on a common and popular use-case for JSON. It
>>> provides a container to hold parsed and serialised JSON types. It provides
>>> more flexibility and better benchmark performance than its competitors.
>>>
>>> JSON highlights the following features in the documentation:
>>>
>>>    - Fast compilation
>>>    - Require only C++11
>>>    - Fast streaming parser and serializer
>>>    - Easy and safe API with allocator support
>>>    - Constant-time key lookup for objects
>>>    - Options to allow non-standard JSON
>>>    - Compile without Boost, define BOOST_JSON_STANDALONE
>>>    - Optional header-only, without linking to a library
>>>
>>> (a point I would like to add in highlight: it has cool Jason logo 😝)
>>>
>>>
>>> To quickly understand and get the flavour of the library take a look at
>>> "Quick Look"
>>> <http://master.json.cpp.al/json/usage/quick_look.html>
>>>
>>> You can find the source code to be reviewed here:
>>> <https://github.com/CPPAlliance/json/tree/master>
>>>
>>> You can find the latest documentation here:
>>> <http://master.json.cpp.al/>
>>>
>>> Benchmarks are also given in the document which can be found here:
>>> <http://master.json.cpp.al/json/benchmarks.html>
>>>
>>> Some people have also given the early reviews, the thread can be found
>>> here:
>>> <https://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2020/09/249745.php>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please provide in your review information you think is valuable to
>>> understand your choice to ACCEPT or REJECT including JSON as a
>>> Boost library. Please be explicit about your decision (ACCEPT or REJECT).
>>>
>>> Some other questions you might want to consider answering:
>>>
>>>   - What is your evaluation of the design?
>>>   - What is your evaluation of the implementation?
>>>   - What is your evaluation of the documentation?
>>>   - What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library?
>>>   - Did you try to use the library? With which compiler(s)? Did you have
>>> any problems?
>>>   - How much effort did you put into your evaluation? A glance? A quick
>>> reading? In-depth study?
>>>   - Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain?
>>>
>>> More information about the Boost Formal Review Process can be found
>>> here: <http://www.boost.org/community/reviews.html>
>>>
>>> Thank you for your effort in the Boost community.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thank you,
>>> Pranam Lashkari, https://lpranam.github.io/
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thank you,
>> Pranam Lashkari, https://lpranam.github.io/
>>
>
>
> --
> Thank you,
> Pranam Lashkari, https://lpranam.github.io/
>

-- 
Thank you,
Pranam Lashkari, https://lpranam.github.io/