Boost logo

Boost :

From: Gavin Lambert (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-09-24 23:31:45


On 25/09/2020 03:49, Edward Diener wrote:
> I understand that it is a free resource for Boost testing and that they
> may not offer much in the way of virtual memory, as well as having
> certain time limits when something is running. But nearly all my tests
> for intensive functionality in Boost PP and VMD run fine to completion
> on my local computer, using gcc, clang, and VC++ on Windows or Linux,
> whereas in the CI testing with Appveyor and Travis CI there are numerous
> "out of memory" and "process killed on timeouts" errors which prevents
> successful CI tests results. So for my purposes of CI testing these CI
> facilities are almost useless on the whole to tell me whether some
> change is valid or not. That's fine. I just will pay little attention to
> the overall result of the CI tests, since they do not reflect real world
> results because of the CI limitations.

Perhaps you should disable those specific tests for CI builds, while
keeping them for the normal test matrix? That would keep both useful.


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk