From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-09-25 11:05:06
On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 at 10:57, Andrzej Krzemienski via Boost
> My understanding of a "vocabulary type" is that it should be usable (not
> necessarily with maximum efficiency) for *any* usage. In the case of JSON
> that would mean that I should be able to represent any value that
> corresponds to a valid JSON when converted to text. I do not think that
> json::value can claim that without the ability to serialize arbitrarily big
I fully agree with this statement.
json::value *needs* to support arbitrary numbers. It's incomplete without it.
Maybe the author of multiprecision can advise on the best type to use
there (gmp or mpfr?).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk