From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-10-09 07:20:41
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 at 19:05, Benedek Thaler <thalerbenedek_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 5:36 PM Mateusz Loskot <mateusz_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 at 12:51, Benedek Thaler via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > >
> > > PFR is ACCEPTed into Boost, with the following results:
> > >
> > > ACCEPT: 5 votes
> > > CONDITIONAL ACCEPT: 1 vote
> > > REJECT: 0 votes
> > >
> > > After all these changes have been implemented, Antony would really
> > > like to have a mini-review, regardless that the library is already
> > > ACCEPTed, further confirming his high standards.
> > Typically, mini-review is offered after a review
> > concludes with a "conditionally accepted" result.
> > Mini-review is to determine if the conditions have been met,
> > but that is not the case here.
> > [...]
> Perhaps my use of the term "mini-review" was confusing.
> PFR is ACCEPTed, therefore the formal process was concluded.
> After a library is accepted, it typically takes time to adjust the
> library to the boost infrastructure,
> and to address comments (without addressing the comments, there's no
> point requiring detailed reviews).
> Antony is transparent regarding the planned changes,
> and would like to hear the opinion of those who were interested,
> after those changes have been made - in the form of a non-mini-review.
> (it is not part of the formal process, so there's no formal name of this event)
Thanks for the clarification.
All my questions have been answered.
-- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk