The new Boost 17.0.0

From: Mike (mike.dev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-11-29 23:10:25

> Gesendet: Sonntag, 29. November 2020 um 22:43 Uhr
> Von: "Edward Diener via Boost" <boost_at_[hidden]>
>
> On 11/29/2020 10:47 AM, Mike via Boost wrote:
> >> Gesendet: Samstag, 28. November 2020 um 18:32 Uhr
> >> Von: "Edward Diener via Boost" <boost_at_[hidden]>
> >>
> >> On 11/28/2020 11:47 AM, Mike via Boost wrote:

> > [...]
> >>
> >>> - Obviously a c++03 lib can't use std::chrono::duration or std::string_view
> >>>     in its interface. The former can sometimes be added as additional overload
> >>>     if available, however, adding the latter almost certainly leads to ambiguous
> >>>     overload resolution situations. So instead I have to convert the c++11/17/20
> >>>     types into the appropriate boost types.
> >>
> >> I think this is valid. But you are certainly allowed to create a PR for
> >> a Boost library which changes its use of a Boost type to its C++
> >> standard library equivalent, with the proviso that the Boost library's
> >> base C++ level be C++11 and not C++03. The latter should not be an issue
> >> since Boost has already stated that Boost officially supports C++11 on
> >> up.
> >
> > [...]
> > Could you point me to this statement?
>
> What statement ?

Whatever you meant when you wrote:

> since Boost has already stated that Boost officially supports C++11 on up.