From: Antony Polukhin (antoshkka_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-12-01 20:12:58
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020, 19:14 Peter Dimov via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
> Jeff Garland wrote:
> > Why not just alternate releases -- so we'd have a 20 release and then a
> > release, etc?
> I have no idea how that's supposed to work.
> > If we did pull this off, one interesting problem that would be induced
> > what various linux distros ship with...
> Linux distros ship Boost built with the default gcc, with the default C++
> standard. g++ defaults to C++03 before g++-6, to C++14 before g++-11. A
> C++17 Boost will be unshippable for a while. C++14 is kind of acceptable
GCC moves to c++17 by default
AFAIK Clang plans the same move
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk