Re: The new Boost 17.0.0

From: Glen Fernandes (glen.fernandes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-12-01 20:35:50

On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 3:27 PM Antony Polukhin wrote:
>
> Exactly that's the problem I'm trying to solve with the Boost17. The
> problem becomes much bigger, when the Boost library becomes part of the
> iterface. For example, Boost.DLL needs shared_ptr and filesystem in it's
> interface. Users suffer from boost::filesystem and boost::shared_ptr if
> their projects use C++17 std:: alternatives.

Why haven't you solved it for Boost.DLL users by switching to
std::shared_ptr and std::filesystem yet? You don't need anyone's
permission.

Glen