From: Kostas Savvidis (kotika98_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-12-01 22:17:59
> On Dec 2, 2020, at 00:01, Edward Diener via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> OTOH if he is compiling with C++11 on up he is probably using std::random instead of boost::random so your choice is right.
I am providing my new, better RNG in boost::random since convincing LWG to include it in std::random will take some while longer ;)
(btw, std:array is not a part of any interfaces of boost::random it is a purely an internal issue which, yes, I know, is not considered as serious)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk