From: Brian Wood (woodbrian77_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-12-02 21:03:24
Peter Dimov writes:
> Marshall Clow wrote:
> > I must concur with Ville here; I have had several people tell me they
> > use Boost because ?it changes with every release?.
> Boost does change with every release, and I still keep using 1.38 in
> projects of mine, but these changes are not limited to ABI at all.
> Everything changes, you have to retest the whole lot, for correctness as
> well as performance.
> And in general, expecting ABI stability from a collection of predominantly
> header-only libraries is setting one up for severe disappointment.
> The standardized libraries are more header-only than Boost so am
not sure how this isn't a rap on them also. Somehow C++ has become
successful in spite of this.
Ebenezer Enterprises - In G-d we trust.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk