From: Hans Dembinski (hans.dembinski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-01-04 08:50:22
> On 30. Dec 2020, at 13:20, Paul A Bristow via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Boost.Math has a documented minimum requirement of C++11 (but many library functions, distributions etc still work with C++03, and some new library items require C++17, and some are likely to require C++20 very soon).
> I'm sorry that this doesn't fit neatly into your schema â¹
I am curious, which parts of Boost.Math have a minimum requirement of C++17 or later? I could not tell from a quick glance at the github page or the docs... Can a math library consisting mostly of functions and algorithms not be written in a way to have a minimum requirement of C++11 and optionally support later standards?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk