Boost logo

Boost :

From: Alexander Grund (alexander.grund_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-01-11 11:40:49

>> Can we get a list of changes requested on the current implementation?
> The initial change has been done correctly, which is to provide a "C++
> standard minimum level" display field for each library which has its
> JSON field of "cxxstd" set to some value. I also have agreed with
> Peter Dimov's remark, which was also suggested earlier in this thread,
> that the "Standard" display field for each library should be removed,
> since it's meaning is obsolete and now also confusing. I have also
> suggested that if we are removing the "Standard" display field we
> should also remove the "Standard Proposals" and "TR1 libraries" sort
> categories, which are likewise obsolete.
> I personally think that since we now have a "C++ standard minimum
> level" display field it would also be nice to be able to have a sort
> category based on that display field called, let's say, "C++ Minimum".

Fully agreed.

And my remark was that (at least for me) "C++ standard minimum level" is
to long and doesn't fully display on the website leading to "C++
standard minimum lev11" to be shown instead of  "C++ standard minimum
level : 11"

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at