Boost logo

Boost :

From: Alexander Grund (alexander.grund_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-01-11 14:12:06

>> And my remark was that (at least for me) "C++ standard minimum level"
>> is to long and doesn't fully display on the website leading to "C++
>> standard minimum lev11" to be shown instead of "C++ standard minimum
>> level : 11"
> I am good with changing that. Maybe just "C++ standard minimum". I am
> worried that if we just specify "C++ standard" or "C++ level" there
> will be programmers who think that if they see, let's say, "11" that
> they will not be able to use that library unless they are compiling
> with exactly C++11. I know that may sound ridiculous, but the less
> confusion the better.
"Minimum C++ standard"?

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at