From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-06-03 18:59:44
Andrey Semashev wrote:
> On 6/3/21 9:30 PM, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> > Andrey Semashev wrote:
> >> But that would mean one has to specify second order dependencies as
> >> well for configure checks.
> > Â¯\_(ã)_/Â¯
> Ok, so it seems I'll have to add a check to enforce that the unified headers
> directory exists. This means that we are still dependent on `b2 headers`, at
> least until there is a CMake equivalent.
"We" are not dependent on any such thing, and there will never be such a
CMake equivalent. This directory will not be maintained in a CMake build.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk