Re: is_constant_evaluated

From: Gavin Lambert (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-08-04 23:14:52

On 5/08/2021 7:03 am, Andrey Semashev wrote:
> I might add that including <type_traits> just to test got a feature 
> macro is not good.

It wouldn't be good in something like Boost.Config, no.

But if you're doing that check at actual point of use then you've almost 
certainly already included <type_traits> anyway, so it's "free".